The Courts denied any "Discovery" and did not acknowledge my father's Executive Order 11098, in which he provides rights for all children -from the date of conception -or that he wrote 'my child, 'child of mine' 57 times in his Will when only I was his only child at the time.

Appellate Justice Guido Calabresi used his factual interpretation of the Executive Order:
"People who take political stance that they don't live in their private lives, lord knows."

Simply put, 'a child of the President of the United States who is not born of a legally married couple is not considered a child and can not be a party to claim from his father as a child.'